Monthly Archives: December 2012

whitehouse.gov online petition: Impeach Sen. Diane Feinstein for violating her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, re: AWB

via: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/impeach-sen-diane-feinstein-violating-her-oath-support-and-defend-constitution-united-states-re-awb/sdKKkKJ5

We petition the Obama administration to: Impeach Sen. Diane Feinstein for violating her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, re: Assault Weapons Ban

Sen. Diane Feinstein has announced that she will be introducing new gun legislation in Jan 2013. The proposals of this legislation are in direct contradiction to both the spirit and letter of the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Her blatant disregard for the rights of citizens, and willingness to make criminals of a large number of law abiding gun owners, needs to be addressed. The summary of the new proposals can be seen at:

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?File_id=10993387-5d4d-4680-a872-ac8ca4359119

Please sign today, and write your elected representatives!

Created: Dec 27, 2012
———–
and another making rounds

via https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/try-senator-dianne-feinstein-federal-court-treason-constitution/TVq4dXPg

We petition the Obama administration to: Try Senator Dianne Feinstein in a Federal Court For Treason To The Constitution

The Constitution was written to restrain the government. No amendment is more important for this purpose than the 2nd amendment. The 2nd amendment was written so the power could be kept with the citizenry in the face of a tyrannical government. It was well understood the Constitution acknowledged certain rights that could not be limited by government.

Senator Dianne Feinstein has made it clear she does not believe in the Constitution or the inalienable rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. She is actively working to destroy the 2nd amendment with her 2013 assault weapons ban. For this reason we the people of the united States petition for her to be tried in Federal Court for treason to the Constitution.

An outline of her bill may be found here:

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public

Created: Dec 27, 2012

2 Comments

Filed under Man

Mandatory drug testing to start at Saint Mary’s High School – COS CO


POSTED: 12:55 PM MST Dec 13, 2012  
Drug Testing In High School

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. –Starting in the fall of 2013, school officials at Saint Mary’s High School said they will start mandatory and random drug testing for all students.

Jon Kraus, the president of St. Mary’s said there has been the occasional incident over drugs, but no major problems at the private Catholic school.

According to Kraus, the change in policy is motivated by the desire to keep the school a totally drug-free zone.

He said it gives students a way to combat peer pressure.

Kraus said, “Having a drug testing policy in high school allows the kids to say, ‘I can’t do that. I might be tested on Monday and I don’t want to get myself in trouble’.”

As a private school, Kraus said students agree to the code of conduct before every school year. These new changes are now part of school policy.

That means at the beginning of the 2013-2014 school year, every student will be required to undergo a hair drug test.

A few strands of hair will be cut from each student.

Those hair samples will be sent to Psychemedics Lab for testing. For more information about the test, click on this link: http://www.psychemedics.com

Then, Kraus said, random testing will start 90 days after the initial drug testing.

Each hair test costs about $40. There are 330 students at St. Mary’s which means the initial testing will cost about $13,200.

Students who test positive for drugs will not be reported to police unless it is required by law or police request results.

School officials said the most important part of the drug testing is that consequences will primarily be focused on helping students through therapeutic means.

However, students who test positive for drugs would be suspended for three days from school. They will also be suspended from co-curricular activities for 30 days.

In addition, administrators said students will be required to get help, especially if addiction is involved. Subsequent drug tests will also be required.

Officials said this is definitely the right choice for St. Mary’s High School.

According to administrators, parents and students should feel free to ask questions and voice concerns during the next few months.

Voluntary testing with parental permission is scheduled to start in March.

 

 

my opinion;

The slippery slope into tyranny is a long one, indoctrinating kids that unreasonable searches are okay and they have no rights under the US CONSTITUTION, specifically the Bill of Rights Article 4. This is an invasion of privacy and up to the parents to do to their kids if warranted, but not through the school system, private or otherwise!

Some think EVERYONE in America should be subjected to mandatory weekly drug testing. Those who fail to provide specimen or fail review will be sent to Guantanamo or some other rendition prison for a little r & r, or maybe we just send ’em to work rehab camps for corporate profits if they are ‘dirty’. Line up, zeee papers please! Be sure to receive your vaccine on the way out!

I understand that you don’t want your children harmed by smoking weed (they have this tendency to loose respect for all authority), yet you might turn right around and give them dangerous psychotropic drugs (anti-depressants) that that they pass out like candy these days to keep people compliant and numb; I know my brother was on them and it almost killed him (the correlation between psychiatric drugs and acts of violence including suicide and homicide has been well documented, look yourself). From what I’ve heard most kids are stealing their parents’ pain pills (aka hillbilly heroin) and od at the er. I wonder if they check for pharmaceuticals, high cholesterol too, and why not a DNA fingerprint for health and the ‘just in case you go missing’ BS!

I forgot since the PATRIOT and NDAA, we Americans have no defense against government or private/corporate intrusion on liberties; as speech, firearm ownership, or unlawful search of your body under the 4th (Bill of Rights); therefore we have no defense for the common liberty, freedom, and justice; only the wars and proxy of corporate/international interests, in far off lands and over the TV, in the name of ‘Freedom’ or keeping ‘terror’ at bay. Nor do we Americans have the presumption of innocence before search, unless warrant issued, since the war on freedom~uh humm I mean ‘war on terror’ makes us all suspect of something or another. We, the US people, should watch for all the signs of oligarchical totalitarianism, and how the ‘beast’ that has shown its head, aka tyranny, because an informed well armed citizenry is the only defense. some think I should take off the tinfoil but yall been warned (those who don’t know the big words look them up)

DNA fingerprinting had been done in Texas for years without parental consent (Andrea Beleno would rather be doing most anything else than dealing with how the State of Texas flat-out stole her son’s DNA fingerprint for a vast database of newborns at the hospital and against consent. For almost seven years, the state had been taking the blood of most newborns in Texas — and storing it without parental consent — for “possible use in medical research”), and under the radar.

I know, “If you aren’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about!”; yet I suspect something much more sinister than simple drug policy enforcement.

VERY IMPORTANT – This is teaching children a very bad message, THAT THEY ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Man

If guns kill people, do pencils mis-spell words?

1 Comment

Filed under Man

What if the US government rejects the Constitution?

via http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/04/12/what-if-government-rejects-constitution

By April 12, 2012, FoxNews.com

What if the government never took the Constitution seriously? What if the same generation — in some cases the same human beings — that wrote in the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech,” also enacted the Alien and Sedition Acts, which made it a crime to criticize the government? What if the feds don’t regard the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land?

What if the government regards the Constitution as merely a guideline to be referred to from time to time, or a myth to be foisted upon the voters, but not as a historic delegation of power that lawfully limits the federal government? What if Congress knows that most of what it regulates puts it outside the confines of the Constitution, but it does whatever it can get away with? What if the feds don’t think that the Constitution was written to keep them off the people’s backs?

What if there’s no substantial difference between the two major political parties? What if the same political mentality that gave us the Patriot Act, with its federal agent-written search warrants that permit unconstitutional spying on us, also gave us ObamaCare, with its mandate to buy health insurance, even if we don’t want or need it? What if both political parties love power more than freedom? What if both parties have used the Commerce Clause in the Constitution to stretch the power of the federal government far beyond its constitutionally ordained boundaries and well beyond the plain meaning of words?

What if both parties love war because the public is more docile during war and permits higher taxes and more federal theft of freedom from individuals and power from the states? What if none of these recent wars has made us freer or safer, but just poorer?

What if Congress bribed the states with cash in return for their enacting legislation that Congress likes, but cannot lawfully enact? What if Congress went to all states in the union and offered them cash to repave their interstate highways, if the states only lowered their speed limits? What if the states took that deal? What if the Supreme Court approved this bribery and then Congress did it again and again? What if this bribery were a way for Congress to get around the few constitutional limitations that Congress acknowledges?

What if Congress believes that it can spend tax dollars on anything it pleases and tie any strings it wants to that spending? What if Congress uses its taxing and spending power to regulate anything it wants to control, whether authorized by the Constitution or not? What if anyone other than members of Congress offered state legislatures cash in return for favorable legislation? What if Congress wrote laws that let it break laws that ordinary people would be prosecuted for breaking?

What if the Declaration of Independence says that the government derives its powers from the consent of the governed? What if the government claims to derive powers from some other source that it will not — because it cannot — name? What if we never gave the government the power to spy on us, to print worthless cash, to kill in our names, to force us to buy health insurance or to waste our money by telling us that exercise is good and sugar is bad?

What if we never gave the government the power to bribe the poor with welfare or the middle class with tax breaks or the rich with bailouts or the states with cash? What if we don’t consent to what has become of the government? What if the Constitution has been tacitly amended by the consent of both political parties, whereby instead of ratifying amendments, all three branches of government merely look the other way when the government violates the Constitution? What if the president cannot constitutionally bomb whatever country he wants? What if the Congress cannot constitutionally exempt its members from the laws that govern the rest of us? What if the courts cannot constitutionally invent a right to kill babies in the womb?

What if the federal government is out of control, no matter which party controls it? What if there is only harmony on Capitol Hill when government is growing and personal liberty is shrinking? What if the presidential race this fall will not be between good and evil, between right and left, between free markets and central planning or even between constitutional government and Big Government; but only about how much bigger Big Government should get?

What if enough is enough? What do we do about it? What if it’s too late?

 

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written six books on the U.S. Constitution. The most recent is “It Is Dangerous To Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom.” To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit http://www.creators.com/

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/04/12/what-if-government-rejects-constitution/#ixzz2ErdzqHUu

Leave a comment

Filed under Man