Mass Shootings Analysis – (DHS New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center)

via https://www.publicintelligence.net/njroic-mass-shootings/

New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center Mass Shootings Analysis

The mass killing incidents this year at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin and a movie theater in Colorado garnered international attention and focused the efforts of public and private sector security officials on the prevention of and response to mass shootings in the United States. This report examines the 29 deadliest mass shootings in the past 13 years, starting with the shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado in 1999, to identify commonalities and trends. These 29 incidents include shooting incidents in which at least five people were killed.

DHS defines an “active shooter” as an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area. In most cases, active shooters use firearms, and there is no pattern or method to their selection of victims. Active shooter situations are unpredictable and evolve quickly. Typically, the immediate deployment of law enforcement is required to stop the shooting and mitigate further harm to victims. Typically, active shooter situations are over within 10 to 15 minutes.

Key Findings

• An analysis of 29 mass shooting incidents in the United States since 1999 indicates that nearly half were workplace shootings.
• All of the shooters but one were males between the ages of 17 and 48. All but one of the 29 incidents were conducted by single shooters.
• Most of the active shooters took their own lives or were shot by responding police officers.
• Only four of the shooters were current or former members of the military.
• Semiautomatic handguns were the most commonly used type of weapon in the mass shootings.

…

…

Analysis of Mass Shootings Since 1999

The 29 mass shootings incidents since 1999 – listed in Appendix 1 – were analyzed to identify commonalities and trends. These include the following:

• Males between the ages of 17 and 48 conducted all of the attacks but one.
• The largest number of mass shootings – 13 of the 29 – occurred at the workplace and were conducted by either a former employee or relative of an employee.
• All of the active shooters were single attackers, with the exception of two students who conducted the shootings at Columbine High School.
• In most of the incidents – 20 of the 29 – the active shooters took their own lives or law enforcement was forced to shoot and kill them, thus leaving their true motives uncertain.
• In only four of the 29 incidents were the shooters active or former members of the U.S. military.
• Semiautomatic handguns are the weapon of choice for mass shootings.

Active Shooters: How to Respond

Following the tragedy that occurred at Virginia Tech in 2007, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a document with recommendations on what to do in the event of an active shooter situation. The most critical recommendation is for both law enforcement and the private sector to have training and conduct drills in order to be prepared for an active shooter incident.

In many of the case studies discussed, there were indicators of potential violence. The following is a list of warning signs that an employee may exhibit in the workplace:

• Increased use of alcohol and/or illegal drugs.
• Unexplained increase in absenteeism; vague physical complaints.
• Noticeable decrease in attention to appearance and hygiene.
• Depression/withdrawal.
• Resistance and overreaction to changes in policy and procedures.
• Repeated violations of company policies.
• Increased severe mood swings.
• Noticeably unstable, emotional responses.
• Explosive outbursts of anger or rage without provocation.
• Suicidal; comments about “putting things in order.”
• Paranoid behavior or utterances (“Everybody is against me”).
• Increasingly talks of problems at home.
• Escalation of domestic problems into the workplace; talk of severe financial problems.
• Talk of previous incidents of violence.
• Empathy with individuals committing violence.
• Increase in unsolicited comments about firearms, other dangerous weapons and violent crime.

 

Additionally via https://www.publicintelligence.net/njroic-school-shootings/

 

New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center School Shootings Commonalities

This report attempts to analyze the indicators and commonalities of recent school shootings in an effort to inform public safety officials and assist in the detection and prevention of potential school shooter plots or attacks. All incidents included in this assessment occurred in the United States while classes were in session. Domestic violence shootings and gang violence were not included in an effort to differentiate between “active shooter” incidents and other acts of violence. DHS defines an “active shooter” as an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area.

Recently several school shooting plots and attacks have occurred throughout the United States, which has resulted in the deaths and injuries of their victims. These incidents included:

• January 2011 (Utah) – Law enforcement officers arrested two teenagers after discovering that they planned to bomb their high school. The two suspects had blueprints of the school and planned to escape after their attack by stealing a plane at a nearby airport.
• February 2011 (Ohio) – A student killed three classmates and injured two others at a high school when he opened fire in the cafeteria.
• April 2012 (California) – A school shooting left seven people dead and three others wounded when a nursing student opened fire at a small Christian college.
• October 2012 (Maryland) – A 15-year old high school student shot and critically injured a classmate on the first day of school.

One or more plots or shootings have occurred in each of the last 10 years in the United States, resulting in the deaths of students and school administrators. These attacks have occurred at all types of schools, including elementary, high school, college, and other educational institutions. In every instance of a school shooting attack in the United States during this period, the attacker has used small arms or homemade explosives.

…

Use of Social Media

In the past several years, the majority of students who have conducted plots or attacks against their schools have publicized their anger or intentions through the use of social media. Not every instance of expression of anger will necessarily result in violence, but when school shootings have occurred, the perpetrators have often previously expressed a fixation with death or inflicting pain on others.

While students have used social media to express their anger and intentions to attack their schools, this type of action is neither new nor limited to online activity. Even without the use of online media, students have expressed their frustration and intentions through other outlets by using handwritten journals, notes, and drawings. These documents can indicate pre-operational planning, as illustrated in the 1999 Columbine shooting. Diary entries of the Columbine shooters, released in 2006, not only contained their anger but also reminders to fill ammunition clips and acquire bomb-making materials, including nails, propane, and fuses.

Recent examples of students publicizing their intentions to plot or attack their schools include the following:

January 2011 (Nebraska) – A high school student who shot one administrator and killed another posted ominous messages on his Facebook page that read., “You’re gonna hear about the evil [expletive] I did but that [expletive] school drove me to this. I want you guys to remember me for who I was before this. I greatly affected the lives of the families ruined but I’m sorry. Goodbye.”  These attacks occurred despite the existence of these postings because friends or family were unaware of these writings until law enforcement investigated the shootings and searched the students’ computers.

February 2012 (Ohio) – Authorities discovered several Facebook postings by a high school student attending Chardon High School after he killed three classmates. One of his Facebook postings read, “He longed for only one thing, the world to bow at his feet,” and ended ominously, “Die, all of you.”

In 2012 law enforcement officers arrested several students after they posted threatening language online. In one instance, in January 2012, two students were arrested for planning to bomb their school after one of them shared their plans with another student, who then informed school officials. When questioned by law enforcement, one of the students stated that not only was the 1999 Columbine High School shooting their inspiration, but also that they hoped to surpass its death toll. This instance and several others in which a concerned student or parent informed the local police department, preventing the attack, demonstrate the importance of reporting suspicious activities.

While social media has provided students with a venue to post their anger and intent, the Internet can also provide them with access to violent web sites. Violent online material has the potential to influence an already emotionally troubled student producing sometimes negative and deadly consequences. In 2005 a 16-year old, who posed messages on a neo-Nazi website calling himself the Angel of Death, killed nine people and wounded seven before committing suicide. Some online material can also provide instructions on weapons use and bomb construction.

…

Who are the shooters?

In the last 10 years, male students have been responsible for the majority of school shootings nationwide. Students who perpetrated attacks were also more likely to know their intended targets rather than to attack their victims randomly. When students targeted an administrator, they believed that either the school failed to protect them from bullies, or the student felt school officials unfairly reprimanded them.

The remaining attackers were outsiders with no relationship to the school or school employees who attacked their supervisors because of employment disputes. One instance of a school employee attacking a school occurred in March 2012, when hours after a teacher was fired, he returned to school and shot dead a school administrator prior to committing suicide. Outsider shooters with no relation to the school, on the other hand, are more likely to attack their victims randomly because these attackers had no discernible association with the school and had no grievances with any potential victims.

In 2006, two separate outsider attackers shared similar tactics, one at Platte Canyon High School in Colorado in September, and another at an Amish school at Nickel Mines, PA, in October. In both incidents, the gunmen attacked the schools, took several female students hostage, and killed one or more students, before taking their own lives moments before law enforcement officers broke into the classrooms. The threat from outside attackers is not, however, limited to a gunman entering a school. Shooters have also targeted students by waiting outside the school or near the perimeter during recess or at dismissal.

The Pharma Reich

by Fred Black@http://12160.org/profiles/blogs/the-pharma-reich

 

For anyone who has ever wanted to see just how deep the rabbit-hole goes, nothing unearths the big picture like investigating pharmaceutical companies. The same usual suspects keep appearing time and time again, joining the dots to the matrix of deceit which enslaves and poisons humanity. A majority of modern day big pharma companies all derive from one source.

Financed by Wall St, in 1925 a super corporation was created in Germany from six already giant chemical companies: BASF, Bayer, Agfa, Hoechst, Weiler-ter-Meer, and Griesheim-Elektron. These six companies were merged into Interessens-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie AG, or IG Farben for short.

IGF was described as “a state within a state”, and it was said by Anthony C. Sutton that: “Without the capital supplies by Wall Street, there would have been no I.G. Farben, and almost certainly no Adolph Hitler and World War II.”

In 1928 American interests in Farben were organised into a Swiss holding company – I.G. Chemie, control of which rested in Germany. In 1929 the American firms that comprised I.G. Chemie merged to become American IG Chemical Corporation, or American IG, later renamed General Aniline & Film.

William Dodd, U.S. ambassador to Germany, 1937: “A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany. I have had plenty of opportunity in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. . .They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there.”

Three board members of American IG were tried and convicted as German ‘war criminals’ at the Nuremberg Trials.

I.G. Farben’s contributions to the world include Zyklon B (cyanide-based pesticide), and the more deadly Sarin nerve gas. Sarin is such a speedy and efficient exterminator due to it being a fluorinated gas (Isopropyl methylphosphonofluoidate).

I.G. Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries, because it had been found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain. This damage had a very particular effect. It made it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom, he became more docile towards authority.

Both the Germans and the Russians added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile.

Dr. Phyllis Mullenix established conclusively that fluoride crosses the blood/brain barrier. (Very few substances can cross this barrier, whose job it is to protect the brain from toxic exposure.)

Dr. George Waldbott:

“Another well-substantiated case, severe brain damage, convulsions form drinking Saginaw (Washington) water. Through investigation including exploratory brain surgery, patient continued to eliminate 4 mgs daily of retained fluorine two months after fluoridation discontinued.”

When Mrs Marsh the Colgate lady said “It really does get in”, she wasn’t f*cking around.

The Mellon family were the founders of the original Mellon Institute whence came the “amazing (but totally fallacious) sodium fluoride/dental caries prevention discovery” – the discovery that literally turned ‘garbage into gold’.

The Mellon family also founded the American Aluminium Company (Alcoa), the largest producer of the waste toxin, sodium fluoride, which up to this point of ‘caries discovery’ had a relatively little known commercial or industrial value, was an environmental hazard of great public concern, and was very costly in terms of safe disposal.

It is also interesting to note that Alcoa’s Andrew Mellon became Treasury Secretary under President Woodrow Wilson in 1928. Conveniently, Mellon now headed the agency that funded the Public Health Service (PHS).

In 1939 Alcoa transferred its technology to Germany; the Dow Chemical Company transmitted its experience and technology in that same period. At this time the US itself, was in search of incapacitating agents to put in the enemy’s water supply. LSD was one such “agent” tested; the program went on for many decades and included the infamous MK-ULTRA experiments.

The “Rockefeller Report” to the United States President on CIA activities said: “The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behaviour”.

An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological behaviour control, Dr. George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department of Psychology at Colgate University. Colgate was and remains the most ardent producer and advocate for the fluoridation of a domestic product – fluoridated toothpaste.

Incidentally, I.G. Farben not only controlled subsidiaries that are today’s big pharma companies, they also commanded cartel agreements with companies such as General Mills, M.W. Kellogg Co., Nestle and Colgate.

Included in I.G.’s business plan for the last half of the twentieth century was the successful rise of the “Forth Reich.” Their records record this as the “neuordnung,” that is “New Order.”

The DuPont family also had their allies in Germany, aiding armament businesses. To digress a little, Lammont DuPont, his banker Andrew Mellon (ALCOA financer) and one William Randolph Hearst were the co-conspirators who also brought us “Reefer Madness”, the campaign for convincing Americans that marijuana was the devils weed.

Mellon appointed his nephew-in-law, Harry J. Anslinger, to Commissioner of the newly created Federal Bureau of Narcotics in order to successfully stamp out the threat of hemp production.

Swiss based Hoffman-La-Roche is another pharma company linked to I. G. Farben. Roche are the marketers of Rohypnol (fluoridated Valium), and they also produced BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) – one of the more potent substances utilized in the fore mentioned MK-ULTRA experiments.

Sandoz, now Novartis (Swiss pharma), was the original provider of LSD to the CIA in those experiments. In 1953 the CIA provided Eli Lilly with funding to attempt synthesis of LSD as the reagents required by Sandoz for production were expensive and scarce. Lilly chemists succeeded in their quest, and subsequent supplies were from Eli Lilly.

Eli Lilly of course are the makers of Fluoxetine (Prozac), a fluoride based SSRI antidepressant which reportedly, Lilly knew increased violent and suicidal behavior in patients, as far back as 1988, but instructed employees to hide that information.

The Lilly company in 2005 paid out $690 million to settle an estimated 8,000 pending lawsuits in the US, concerning their alleged failure to warn about the risk of their antipsychotic drug Zyprexa causing diabetes.

In the early 1920’s, the Eli Lilly Co. was given the sole and only monopoly for the manufacture and sale of insulin. It is said that Lilly, in order to do the manufacturing, had to steal the procedures and technique for production from the creator of insulin, Dr Scott.

In 2009, Eli Lilly was fined $1.5 billion for marketing Zyprexa for uses not approved by the FDA, namely a treatment for dementia, including Alzheimer’s.

Mercury in vaccines is yet another thing we can thank Eli Lilly for. The addition of thimerosal (ethyl mercury) to vaccines was an initiative undertaken by Lilly in 1929. It is now widely accepted that thimerosal is a significant contributing factor in autism, afflicting 1 child in 168 in the US.

In a congressional hearing examining the use of thimerosal, Congressman Dan Burton said: “You mean to tell me that since 1929, we’ve been using Thimerosal, and the only test that you know of is from 1929, and every one of those people had meningitis, and they all died?”

Depression is caused by brain inflammation which depletes the body of serotonin. Brain inflammation is one of the side effects of vaccines. In the United States, 37% of autistic children are given SSRI’s like Prozac.

Mitch Daniels, once vice president of Eli Lilly, was appointed to the Office of Management and Budget under G. W. Bush in 2001. The Director of the OMB is also a member of the National Security Counsel and Homeland Security Division.

In Nov 2002, an insertion of a “provision” in the “appendix” of the Homeland Security Act was made for exempting Eli Lilly from liability for all damages resulting from thimerosal poisoning. In June 2002, President George W. Bush had also appointed Eli Lilly’s CEO, Sidney Taurel, to a seat on his Homeland Security Advisory Council.

GW wasn’t the first Bush to pimp Eli Lilly. After father George Herbert Walker Bush left his CIA director post in 1977 and before becoming vice president in 1980, he was on Eli Lilly’s board of directors. As vice president, Bush failed to disclose his Lilly stock and lobbied hard on behalf of Big Pharma, especially Eli Lilly.

In 1981, GHW placed this stock ($145,000.00 worth) into a blind trust, meaning that Bush allegedly had no way of knowing whether his trust still owned shares in the firm or not.

GHWB loves a blind trust, just one year prior, 1980; he had also placed his father’s Nazi inheritance into a blind trust. One can only guess how much that inheritance was worth in 1980, but when Prescott Bush was reimbursed in 1951 for his “one share” of Union Banking Corporation, it paid $1.5 million.

Prescott managed UBC directly. His father in law, George Herbert Walker, along with German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, financed Hitler before and during WWII. Near the end of WWI, August Thyssen had opened the Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart in Rotterdam.

W.A. Harriman & Co., managed by G.H. Walker, set up a Berlin branch in 1922. The managing director of Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart met with Walker and the Harriman brothers in New York, 1924 to establish UBC.

Through the mid to late 1920s, UBC sold over $50,000,000 worth of German bonds to American investors. UBC managed banking transactions for the Third Reich until being seized under the trading with the enemy act in 1942.

Walker hired Bush to help him supervise Thyssen/ Flick United Steel Works. Consolidated Silesian Steel Corp was one portion of United Steel Works.

The Auschwitz concentration camp was named after the town of Oswiecim, one of Poland’s richest mineral regions, with Silesian Steel Corp. nearby, utilizing the slave labourers from the camp (an IG Farben factory). Thyssen sold Consolidated Steel to UBC. Under the complete control of Harriman and the management of Bush, the company became the Silesian American Corp.

Another interesting fact about Prescott Bush is that he was integral to the success of the Manhattan Project as US liaison with the UK. Appointed by Eisenhower, his primary duties were to assist the US in acquisition of Uranium and fission technology from the British.

Recently declassified US Military documents show how Fluoride is the key chemical in atomic bomb production and millions of tons of it were needed for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium.

The Manhattan Project was a joint venture between two of the world’s largest and oldest commercial powerhouses of the “Electrical/Energy” industry, Westinghouse and General Electric who have been the primary nuclear contractors for the Pentagon, ever since.

International General Electric was the largest shareholder (30%) of German General Electric (A. E. G.), another big contributor to Hitler. Several of AEG’s Directors were also on the board of I. G. Farben. IGF and International General Electric also had the same shareholders.

Polycarbonate, the plastic that leaches Bisphenol A, was developed in Germany and the United States at the same time, in 1955, by Bayer in Germany and General Electric in the United States respectively.

Bisphenol A has been well documented for having hormonal effects on the human body. Scientists have discovered that women who have had three or more consecutive miscarriages had 3 times higher levels of Bisphenol A in their blood than women who had successfully given birth. Bisphenol A is also known to cause Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, a growing epidemic.

There are hundreds of types of plastic, many of them having no effect on the endocrine system, but the industry insists on using Bisphenol A.

Just as Bayer and General Electric had conspired to came up with this product at exactly the same time, financed by Wall St and international bankers, so it is that business continues in the present time.

Today the world’s largest pharmaceutical company is Pfizer Inc. after acquiring rival giant Wyeth for $68 billion in January 2009. The sum included $22.5 billion loaned by five major Wall St Banks.

Pfizer merged with Warner-Lambert in 2000. Warner-Lambert previously acquired Parke-Davis (formerly of the I.G. Farben cartel). In 2002 Pfizer merged with Pharmacia, a conglomerate from the merging of Pharmacia & Upjohn with Monsanto. Monsanto had previously bought G.D. Searle.

Incidentally, General Electric Healthcare ended up buying a biotech division of Pharmacia & Upjohn in 2004, that is after it had undergone mergers in between.

Also in Jan 09, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the largest health care fraud in U.S. history and agreed to pay $2.3 billion to settle a federal investigation into its alleged off-label marketing of the now-withdrawn painkiller Bextra.

This was Pfizer’s fourth such settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice in the last ten years.

The pact follows Pfizer’s October accord to pay $894 million to settle most of the personal-injury suits filed against it by patients who took Bextra or Celebrex. The FDA had recommended the withdrawal citing an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Bextra was originally marketed by G.D. Searle & Company, the kind folk who delivered to us Aspartame, well known as NutraSweet. Developed as an ulcer treatment, a Searle scientist discovered its sweet taste in 1965 while licking it from his fingers and thought, hello, we can sell this to hundreds of millions instead of just a few ulcer sufferers.

In early tests by Searle, the substance showed it produced microscopic holes and tumours in the brains of experimental mice, epileptic seizures in monkeys, and was converted by animals into dangerous substances, including formaldehyde.

To their credit, Searle didn’t let these pesky little details interfere with their aspirations (world domination). Despite the FDA refusing to approve aspartame for 16 years, still they remained undeterred. Searle knew one day, for the right price, someone in government with the necessary authority, would be their whore.

Enter Donald Rumsfeld; he had the toxic sweetener approved by an FDA Commissioner that he had personally installed, even before the swearing in of the government elect (Reagan’s transition team).

Rumsfeld was of course, CEO of Searle at the time. Today aspartame is found in over 5000 products under the names: NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful, E951, Canderel and more. Having no calories, it is marketed in all its forms as a diet product. The great irony is that it has been noted for precipitating the obesity epidemic in the US as it induces a craving for carbohydrates.

Aspartic acid (40% of aspartame), is an excitotoxin that stimulates the neurons of the brain to death causing brain damage. Aspartame is 50% phenylalanine, neurotoxic and goes directly into the brain lowering the seizure threshold and depleting serotonin. Lowered serotonin triggers manic depression or bipolar, suicidal tendencies, mood swings, panic attacks and other types of behavioural and psychiatric problems.

This is all very good news indeed for Novartis, the makers of Ritalin, an amphetamine derivative. Before the approval of aspartame, there was no epidemic of ADHD and no epidemic of Ritalin prescriptions. Rember Novartis formerly Sandoz, were the CIA’s original source of LSD.

From this outstanding contribution to humanity, Mr Rumsfeld never looked back; he continued to excel himself, with each new enterprise being more putrid than the last. During the mid eighties as Ronald Reagan’s special envoy to the Middle East, he supervised the relationship with Saddam Hussein, in which the US supplied to Iraq intelligence, military technology and the necessary ingredients to make weapons of mass destruction.

Those ingredients included the ones for Sarin gas (the I.G. Farben developed, fluorinated nerve gas), which Iraq deployed against Iran. It is reported that the LaFarge Company in America supplied many of the chemicals; Vice President GHW Bush was a sizeable stockholder in this French owned firm. A noted director of American LaFarge was one Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The good will to Iraq wasn’t limited to a bit of fluoride, tributes also included bio weaponry. Senator Riegle’s Congressional Report of 1994 documented that American Type Culture Collection, shipped biological materials to Iraqi government agencies, 1985 – 1986, under license by the U.S. Commerce Department.

Between governments, Donny mainly filled his time selling more weapons, he was CEO of General Instruments and had a board position with Gulfstream Aerospace, later acquired by General Dynamics in 1999, where upon Donny was returned $11 million for his stock shares. He was also on the board of Swiss-based engineering company ABB who happened to sell two nuclear reactors to North Korea for a cool US$200 million.

When Rumsfeld returned to office as Secretary of Defense for G.W. Bush, and made great fanfare over Iraq possessing WMDs, he was right, he had the receipts. However, he also knew full well that junior’s father GHW, had destroyed most of them in operation Dessert Storm, and that the remaining weapons were eradicated by UN inspectors in 1993.

During the hiatus in government for Rumsfeld, he also became Chairman of Gilead Sciences in 1997, another pharmaceutical company; he loves his pharma nearly as much as his weapons, often they are the same thing though.

Gilead owns the intellectual property rights to the anti-viral Tamiflu which is marketed by Hoffman-La Roche (Swiss I.G. Farben). Rumsfeld stood down from the board when he was appointed Secretary of Defense, but it goes without saying that he managed to keep hold of his Gilead stock shares.

Those shares went up and up when in 2005, nothing to do with Donald I’m sure but solely for the good of the nation, G.W. Bush approved an order for 20 million courses of Tamiflu. Bush claimed that 2 million Americans were about to die from an avian flu pandemic.

Tamiflu side effects include: delirium, hallucinations, convulsions, disturbed consciousness, abnormal behaviour and death. As a treatment for influenza, it’s completely f*cking useless, more favourable side effects include all the symptoms of flu: nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, fatigue and coughing. Taken as directed, Tamiflu can reduce the duration of flu symptoms by up to a whole day, but of course, that day you will be experiencing its side effects.

Rumsfeld’s stock shares in Gilead were estimated at between $25-$50 million long before pigs started flying (swine flu) and an absolute sh*t load of Tamiflu has been sold since then.

Nice work if you can get it, selling products to treat the symptoms of the products sold.

Pharma companies make billions producing vaccines. Vaccines do nothing to reduce disease; on the contrary, they are nothing less than injected illness. They make billions pedaling the likes of aspartame. Next they profit in the billions from psychiatric drugs.

Then at this point, if for some reason the consumer still has a functioning heart, liver and kidneys, but obviously is emotionally FUBAR, they will sell even better psych drugs, if not, the billion dollar finale is with selling insulin, other diabetic treatments and heart medications. And when all else fails, their chemical creations will always be in high demand as weapons of war.

Related Stink pages:

Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler

Truth Decay – the history of Fluoride

Bitter Sweet – the Aspartame story

Reefer Madness

References:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Martin_Faga

http://www.gulfweb.org/bigdoc/report/r_1_2.html#exports

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_IG

http://www.hbs.edu/bhr/archives/bookreviews/78/phayes.pdf

http://www.whale.to/b/lsd_lilly.html

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/docs/Syringe_of_death.pdf

http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20090816_biochemical_manipula…

http://www.redrat.net/gorebush/dictator.htm

http://www.healthcarealternatives.net/fluoride.html

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/health/flouride.html

Correction Edit:

“The Mellon family also founded the American Aluminium Company (Alcoa), the largest producer of the waste toxin, sodium fluoride, which up to this point of ‘caries discovery’ had a relatively little known commercial or industrial value, was an environmental hazard of great public concern, and was very costly in terms of safe disposal. It is also interesting to note that Alcoa’s Andrew Mellon became Treasury Secretary under President Woodrow Wilson in 1928. Conveniently, Mellon now headed the agency that funded the Public Health Service (PHS).”

This is exact text from source – www.healthcarealternatives.net It is however slightly inaccurate.

Firstly, Andrew Melon did not “found” ALCOA. Being a very wealthy industrialist and banker however, he did fund its founding.

Secondly, Melon was appointed Secretary of the Treasury by Warren G. Harding in 1921. He served for ten years and eleven months. His service continued through the Coolidge administration and most of the Hoover administration.

If you know your history, you would know Woodrow Wilson held office 1913 – 1921. You know, he was the one who sold out America with the Fed Reserve Act.

Sloppy work, but the other info from the source named, checks out ok on cross examination.

US Constitution, Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment

Via Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

The hypocrisy of the government knows no bounds.  I have said repeatedly, and continue to say, that I am against all gun control at the moment because our government is extremely violent and not only do I not expect it to protect the American people in general, I believe it is far more concerned with protecting the status quo from the people.  It has become crystal clear that the political and financial oligarchs are quite intentionally attempting to disarm the populace while arming themselves to the teeth in anticipation of some horrible economic event they know is inevitable.  From the Blaze:

The Department of Homeland Security is seeking to acquire 7,000 5.56x45mm NATO “personal defense weapons” (PDW) — also known as “assault weapons” when owned by civilians. The solicitation, originally posted on June 7, 2012, comes to light as the Obama administration is calling for a ban on semi-automatic rifles and high capacity magazines.

 

Citing a General Service Administration (GSA) request for proposal (RFP), Steve McGough of RadioViceOnline.com reports that DHS is asking for the 7,000 “select-fire” firearms because they are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.” The term select-fire means the weapon can be both semi-automatic and automatic. Civilians are prohibited from obtaining these kinds of weapons.

 

That being said, it is reasonable for the Department of Homeland Security to request these rifles as they are indeed effective personal defense weapons. The agency is tasked with keeping Americans safe from those who wish to do the country harm, and its officials should be equipped with all the tools they need to do so effectively.

See the meme being pushed here?  These guys want the entire population completely domesticated.  They want us to depend on the government for food.  For healthcare.  For self-defense.  Two sets of laws.  One for the “rulers” and one for the “ruled.”  This is the opposite of how things function in a free society.

I am sorry, but unless you think the DHS is preparing for an invasion by Al Qaeda, it is quite clear these weapons are being bought for future use against the citizenry of the United States.  The writing on the wall couldn’t be clearer.

Full article here.

 

Mainstream Media Perception Management – Information Operations

What the New World Order wants, it will get. By managing information and perception these people play god, tooling the the behavior of each individual and the social fabric around us. Getting a glimpse at the wizard behind curtain is the only way out of Oz. Knowing perceptions management and manufacture techniques is necessary to finding truth amongst opinions, thereby beating the psychological manipulation with media. Understanding the MSM and other uses of the psywar by global overseers is key to reality based awareness in the 21st century. Realize that the whole planet is theater to this ‘Global War on Terror’, therefore US Soil is not exempt. The war for our minds and $!

via https://www.publicintelligence.net/nato-io/

The following is NATO’s standard doctrine for information operations.  Though unclassified, NATO doctrine documents are not released to the public.

ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR INFORMATION OPERATIONS AJP-3.10

• 82 pages
• November 2009

Information in the Global Security Environment. The changing global security situation has seen a shift in emphasis from the certainties of super-power confrontation towards more complex interactions of state and non-state actors. Globalization, competition for resources and tensions in political and social structures combine with ideological, religious and cultural distinctions to increase uncertainty. … To address both the changing global security situation and the emergence of a new information environment, NATO is in the process of developing concepts, processes and doctrine, including Information Operations (Info Ops), to deal with these new challenges.

…

Non-Lethal Activities. While Information Objectives may be accomplished through lethal or non-lethal means, there is likely to be an increased focus on non-lethal activity. A large element of Info Ops is non-lethal and recent operations have shown its significance by increasing the commander’s choice of means, by which effects can be created or generated at all stages of a crisis to support achievement of objectives. Increased attention on Info Ops is also due to the realization that we now live in an information-dominated environment as described in paragraph 0101. There is an increased reliance on, and desire for, information. In addition, the impact of real-time media coverage of crises, the exploitation and manipulation of the media by some parties and the ever-increasing use of technologies such as the Internet have resulted in a world where information plays an increasingly important role.

The Impact of the Media. All crises occur under the spotlight of the international media. The maintenance of understanding and support of public opinion is crucial for democratically accountable governments, and this influences the options they can take, including military action, and the presentation of these options to different audiences. In order to gain and maintain public support, national governments and international organizations/agencies need to show a degree of transparency in their actions, and these actions must be in accordance with international law. The influence of the media has increased as access to regional and international media has increased. This has been brought about by technologies such as satellite broadcasting and global connectivity through the Internet. In addition, the availability of relatively cheap printing and copying equipment has brought newspapers and other printed material to a much wider audience.

…

Information activities coordinated through Info Ops are an integral part of the campaign plan aimed specifically at affecting the will and understanding of decision-makers and affecting those capabilities that directly enable the application of their will or aid their understanding. Effects in the information environment can be created by a variety of military activities, the close coordination of which will contribute to the achievement of the overall objective. Info Ops comprises three inter-related activity areas:

a. Information activities that focus on changing, influencing, or reinforcing perceptions and attitudes of adversaries and other NAC approved parties.

b. Information activities that focus on preserving and protecting Alliance freedom of manoeuvre in the information environment by defending the data and information that supports Alliance decision-makers and decision-making processes.

c. Information activities that focus on countering command functions and capabilities, by affecting the data and information that support adversaries and other NAC approved parties, and are used in command and control, intelligence, surveillance and target acquisition, and weapon systems.

While information operations focusing on preserving and protecting Alliance freedom of maneuver in the information environment should take place at all times, information operations activities focused on influence (paragraph 0119 a) and counter command (paragraph 0119 c) may only take place as part of an OPLAN and thus with NAC approval, including definition by the NAC of adversaries and potential adversaries.

———————-

ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS AJP-3.10.1(A)

• 106 pages
• October 2007

The purpose of Allied Joint Publication (AJP)-3.10.1 Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations is to address the planning and conduct of military PSYOPS in support of NATO activities. PSYOPS, as one of the key contributors to most information operations (INFO OPS) activities, will achieve their greatest effect when coordinated within the larger INFO OPS plan and supporting a much broader information strategy. The new construct of INFO OPS is focused on affecting will, understanding, and capability through the three activities of influence, counter-command, and information protection. It must be noted that PSYOPS has influence activity as its mission; and by influencing target audiences (TA) directly, PSYOPS, in turn, has indirect effects on understanding and capability.

…

0104. The psychological dimension of conflict is as important as the physical. Conflict is a struggle of wills, that takes place in people’s minds as well as on the battlefield. The attitudes and behaviour of people (friend, foe and the undecided or uncommitted) may be central to determining the outcome of conflict and the nature of the post-conflict environment. Therefore it is necessary to understand the motivation of various target audiences — leaders, military forces, populations — in order to shape their perceptions, affect their will and to persuade them to accept the outcome desired by NATO. The employment of any element of power projection, particularly the military element, has always had a psychological dimension. PSYOPS, as a key element of most INFO OPS activity, are a vital part of the broad range of NATO diplomatic, military, economic, and informational activities.

0105. PSYOPS are enhanced by the expansion of mass communication capabilities. NATO may multiply the effects of its military capabilities by communicating directly to its intended targets. The effectiveness of this communication depends on the perception of the communicator’s credibility and capability to carry out promises or threatened actions in a manner that will be significant to the cultural norms and attitude of the individuals targeted. The employment of any NATO element has a psychological dimension. Perceptions of NATO capabilities are fundamental to strategic deterrence. The effectiveness of deterrence and other strategic concepts hinges on the ability to influence the perceptions of others. It is important not to confuse psychological impact of military operations with planned psychological operations, although the two can be mutually supporting and should be anticipated and coordinated.

0106. PSYOPS constitute a planned process of conveying messages to selected groups, known as target audiences, to promote particular themes that result in desired attitudes and behaviour that affect the achievement of political and military objectives. A target audience is defined by NATO as “an individual or group selected for influence or attack by means of psychological operations” (AAP-6). Given the potential benefit of PSYOPS as an effective force multiplier and combat reducer, commanders at all levels should always consider its use in support of their military aims and objectives. The three basic aims of PSYOPS are to:

a. Weaken the will of the adversary or potentially adversary target audiences.

b. Reinforce the commitment of friendly target audiences.

c. Gain the support and cooperation of uncommitted or undecided audiences.

…

B106. Principles of visual media design. Whilst the design of a visual product is heavily dependent upon the message content and the imagination and skill of the artist, it is nevertheless possible to identify basic components to develop effective PSYOPS products, based on the knowledge about human perception and the differences between discernment and insight. The human perception can be represented with six stages as a process. The following stages are based on each other:

a. Value orientation. The first task of a product is to gain and maintain the attention and interest of the target audience. The single way to activate somebody is to key in on his already existing needs and motives. Therefore, the PSYOPS product has to consider the current hierarchy of needs and level of need satisfaction of the selected target audience.

b. Activation. Activation is only possible if it triggers a response to existing needs. Needs of the target audience must be identified by PSYOPS, who then develop themes and messages which are aimed at meeting these established needs. The recipient must be able to recognise a personal benefit from action demanded from him. The product design should amplify and canalise already existing motives and needs.

The perception of a person can be affected by three kinds of stimuli:

(1) Emotional stimuli. They cause an immediate emotional response (Love, peace, little child image).

(2) Physical stimuli (size, colour and shapes of symbols). They cause no activation alone. However, they amplify the message.

(3) Intellectual stimuli (surprise, necessity or contradiction). They draw the observer into the product.

c. Reception. “A picture is worth a thousand words.” The PSYOPS statement should be understandable in a look and should be immediately credible. Long text passages and box sentences inhibit fast consumption of information. slogans, headings, headlines and/or other succinct, clear messages should be used wherever possible.

d. Comprehension. The messages of a product must not become misunderstood and should be easy to recognise. The message or picture should activate perception and motivate the recipient to act. Pictures and text must be quickly understandable by themselves and should provide common information. Therefore, passive voice, vague or confusing language, ideological or religious discussion, and abstract statements and symbols are to be avoided.

e. Memory. In addition to the initial impact of a visual PSYOPS product, the memory of that product by the target audience is an additional meaningful factor that requires attention. The level of memory increases through: Information emphasised in colour, concrete photos, positive statements, pictorial language and concise text. They may have to be modified considerably in the light of local communication style.

f. Impact. A significant precondition might be that the product appears as non-threatening and stimulates a positive feeling. The effect becomes amplified through a positive image of the sender, the plausibility of the message and if a way out of a personal conflict situation is offered to the recipient. The observer must be able to recognise a personal benefit from action demanded by it. The product design should amplify and canalise already existing motives and needs.

…

B112. Selection of announcers

a. An announcer should be chosen primarily on the basis of his or her clarity of voice and correct colloquial pronunciation of the language in use, although a foreign audience will not expect native speaker qualification from a NATO source. It is also desirable that his or her voice should carry conviction and suggest a personality appropriate to the material being transmitted. While not essential, much benefit will result if the announcer has sufficient local knowledge and creative insight to contribute to the drafting of his/her own scripts.

b. The use of indigenous personnel, possibly including defectors, is a simple and effective way of meeting the problem of language or dialect. However, if this method is employed, special attention must be paid to the question of security, including the physical security of locals working for NATO. In particular, all recorded material must be checked for accuracy of content by a trusted interpreter. Live transmissions should only be made by local nationals of proven loyalty. Every effort should be taken to provide at least one military interpreter for a PSYOPS unit for checking samples of translations and for interpreting in sensitive situation.

…

B119. Internet. The Internet differs from the other media described mainly on two accounts. First it is in principle unlimited in reach. Second it is a medium where the target audience has to actively seek information, and where PSYOPS messages will compete for attention with a lot of other information, including information provided by adversaries. This leads to a strong requirement for making the material published interesting. At present there are in general three ways of using the Internet in PSYOPS: Operating a home page, sending e-mails, addressed to specific and selected targets, and having a chat room. A home page will be generally available to a large audience, whereas targets for e-mail can be groups or individual persons. Chat rooms will normally be directed at groups.

a. Advantages

(1) Reach. Due to the virtually unlimited reach of the Internet it is possible to readily access target audiences worldwide.

(2) Speed. An important characteristic of the Internet is the virtual instantaneous availability of the messages worldwide. This makes it easy and quick to produce messages far away from the target audience. However, an adversary is likewise able to publish over long distances quickly.

(3) Cheap. As a means of dissemination the Internet is cheap. However, the editorial skills and facilities of the required quality may not be.

b. Limitations. When using websites NATO units has to take the relationship to Press & Information activities in to consideration, according to “Guidelines for PSYOPS websites”.

c. Disadvantages

(1) Reach. Due to the unlimited reach of the Internet it is virtually impossible to limit the availability of information published to selected audiences, unless it is sent directly to the target audience as e-mail. This increases the requirement to minimise the negative impact of messages on unintended target audiences.

(2) Computer availability and literacy. Since the target audience has to be able to access the Internet; computers, network access and the ability to exploit the technology have to be available, there are at present limits in the reach in less developed areas. However, target audiences in the NATO countries are easily accessible by adversaries.

(3) Anonymity. On the Internet it is easy to hide the true identity of the originator of a message.

(4) Competition. With a lot of very different information being readily available on the Internet, the PSYOPS messages have to appeal to the target audiences much more than in most other media.

(5) Manipulation. This electronic medium may be easily modified by adversaries and other parties.

…

ANNEX C ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR

Section I – The motivation of the individual

C101. General. Motivation, in general, represents a direct and dynamic component of behaviour, which is determined by a combination of biological, social, and learning factors. Motivation activates behaviour in pursuit of a goal. Current motivational needs influence perception, reasoning, learning and other psychological processes. Its main characteristics are:

a. Motivation is tied to inner conditions and processes, which can only be observed indirectly, through its behavioural outputs.

b. Motivation is not always equal to behaviour, as behaviour tends also to be determined by biological, social, and cultural factors along with perception, reasoning, learning and other psychological processes.

c. The result of motivation is almost always some kind of activity.

d. Motivated behaviour can be described by energy mobilization; persistent, intensive and effective behaviour; direction towards an objective; and change in behaviour dependant upon consequences.

e. Human behaviour is directed towards an objective. As soon as the objective is achieved, this need is satisfied.

f. As soon as one need is satisfied, others occur; therefore, motivation and the requirement to satisfy needs is a never-ending process.

C102. Hierarchy of needs/motives. From an individual’s point of view, the most important drive (which also determines behaviour) is the desire to satisfy his or her individual needs. These range from simple physical requirements of the body (hunger, thirst, etc.) to complex psychological demands such as the desire for recognition and self-esteem. These various needs can be represented as a hierarchy, with the most fundamental and primitive at the bottom of the scale, and the most complex and abstract at the top (see Figure C-1 below). The theory of motivation suggests that individual needs can be described by a scale of satisfaction. However, not all target audiences rate.

…

C127. PSYOPS and communication

a. Means. The means used for the transfer of PSYOPS messages encompass all the usual means of human communication like word-of-mouth, books, newspapers, loudspeakers, radio, TV, etc. They also include emerging technologies that allow messages to be transferred from senders to receivers (such as mobile phones, e-mail, etc.)

b. When conducting PSYOPS, planners should emphasize the use of key communicators as they are the ones who can transfer messages to the TA most effectively. Key elements when considering the use of key communicators are authority, group belonging, and the attraction of the source. For maximum effectiveness of PSYOPS, a credible source of information is necessary. In the minds of the TA, a key communicator should be “one of them”: a persuasive and powerful speaker.

c. Messages. The following should be taken into consideration when crafting PSYOPS messages: message visibility, accessibility, appeal, clarity, simplicity, persuasiveness, the principal of need (i.e., promising the TA you will fulfil their needs), and the principle of unpredictability (i.e., using “soft” methods of persuasion, which allow for adaptation to possible changes).

d. PSYOPS communication techniques. The following are examples of messaging techniques that have been shown to be successful:

(1) Emotional sandwich (emotions – message – emotions).

(2) Emotional transfer (e.g., a flyer with an emotional component like nice pictures, overwritten by the PSYOPS message).

(3) Use of emotionally loaded words.

(4) Use of stereotypes.

…

ANNEX D COUNTER PSYOPS TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES

Section I – Analysis

D101. Aim of counter PSYOPS. The aim of counter PSYOPS is to counter or exploit the effects of adversary propaganda or psychological activities. Counter PSYOPS are directed at approved target audiences that are affected by the adversary propaganda, less our own forces and citizents, who are the responsibility of troop information and PI.

D102. Definition. Actions designed to detect and counteract adversary psychological activities.

D103. Analysis of adversary’s psychological activities. Analysis of an adversary’s psychological activity involves the detailed examination of the source, content, audience, media and effects (SCAME) of his messages to obtain intelligence that supplements the conventional forms of intelligence. The audience and the effects can be unintended as well as intended. The primary purpose of the analysis of an adversary’s psychological activity is to collect PSYOPS-related intelligence information. This is in order to evaluate its effect on own troops as well as on friendly and uncommitted civilian audiences within the AOR, in order to be able to eliminate or diminish the negative consequences, and to exploit any contradiction in that adversary psychological activity. The analysis also involves a systematic study of foreign mass communications intended for domestic and/or international audiences.

D104. Source analysis. Identifies the individual, organisation or government that sponsors and disseminates a particular item of an adversary psychological activity. The three components of source analysis are: actor, authority and author. Sources are further subdivided into:

a. White. An acknowledged source.

b. Grey. An unacknowledged source.

c. Black. Originates from a source other than the one that is claimed.

Original Page: http://publicintelligence.net/nato-psyops

Psychiatric Drugs, Not A Lack Of Gun Control, Are The Common Denominator In Murderous Violence

Lawrence Hunter, Contributor Forbes.com
1/14/2013 @ 8:00AM

In 2000, New York legislators recognized the ubiquitous and unambiguous connection between violence, especially gun violence and mass murder, and the widespread prescribed use of psychiatric drugs. Senate Bill 7035 was introduced in the New York State Senate that year requiring police agencies to report to the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) on certain crimes and suicides committed by a person who is using psychiatric drugs, including assault, homicide, sex offenses, robbery offenses, firearms and other dangerous weapons offenses, kidnapping and arson. The preamble to the bill read, in part:

There is a large body of scientific research establishing a connection between violence and suicide and the use of psychotropic drugs in some cases. This research, which has been published in peer reviewed publications such as the American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and The Journal of Forensic Science, has shown, among other things, that: certain drugs can induce mania (a psychosis which can produce bizarre, grandiose and highly elaborated destructive plans, including mass murder);. . .and certain drugs can produce an acute psychotic reaction in an individual not previously psychotic.

The bill died in committee. Since that time, there have been at least 12 additional high-profile mass murders linked to the use of psychiatric drugs, about one a year. And, in virtually every mass school shooting during the past 15 years, the shooter has been on or in withdrawal from psychiatric drugs. Here is a partial list of 24 such horrific events that occurred since 1998, not including the Virginia Tech shootings and the recent Sandy Hook shootings where the authorities continue to suppress information about whether and to what extent the shooters were on or in withdrawal from a psychiatric drug.

These examples are not unique. According to the Citizens Commission On Human Rights International (CCHR), between 2004 and 2011, there were 12,755 reports to the U.S. FDA’s MedWatch system of psychiatric drugs causing violent side effects including: 1,231 cases of homicidal ideation/homicide, 2,795 cases of mania and 7,250 cases of aggression. Since the FDA admits that only one to ten percent of all side effects are ever reported to it, the actual occurrence of violent side effects from psychiatric drugs is certainly nine or ten times higher than the official data suggest.

Yet, federal and state governments continue to ignore the connection between psychiatric drugs and murderous violence, preferring instead to exploit these tragedies in an oppressive and unconstitutional power grab to snatch guns away from innocent, law-abiding people who are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution the right to own and bear arms to deter government tyranny and to use firearms in self defense against any miscreant who would do them harm. Therefore, it is pharmaceutical makers, not law-abiding gun owners or gun manufacturers, who should be held to account for the series of “lone-wolf,” mass shootings that have occurred since the widespread use of psychiatric drugs began.

Although it is doubtful any single variable can explain what causes someone to commit such unspeakable acts as we saw recently at Sandy Hook, one common denominator surfaces time and time again, in hundreds and hundreds of cases where a “lone wolf” commits violence, murder and mayhem for apparently no reason: Prescribed psychiatric drugs, which are well documented to induce mania, psychosis, violence, suicide and murder, including mass murder for no apparent reason by otherwise non-psychotic people.

Given the mass of supporting data linking psychiatric drug use/withdrawal and violence, and given the fact it has been ignored studiously by the U.S. Congress and federal agencies, it is well past time that Congress and state legislatures and government agencies at all levels formally investigate the well established link between prescribed use of psychiatric drugs, school shootings and similar acts of senseless violence.

This video reveals the indisputable connection between psychiatric drugs and violence, especially young “lone-wolf” shooters in gun massacres.

As psychiatrist Peter Breggin observes in the video:

“One of the things in the past that we’ve known about depression is that it very, very rarely leads to violence. It’s only been since the advent of these new SSRI drugs that we’ve had murderers even mass murders taking these antidepressant drugs.”

Instead of intimidating the NRA into negotiating away Americans’ Second Amendment rights through its seat at the table in Washington, the government should be demanding answers and explanations from PhRMA and the pharmaceutical companies.

Instead of extorting NRA chairman Dave Keene and NRA president Wayne LaPierre into participating with the gun snatchers’ efforts to nullify the Second Amendment in the name of reducing gun violence, why aren’t the White House and Congress putting former Business Roundtable President and current head of PhRMA, John Castellani, along with the presidents of the pharmaceutical companies on the hot seat?

Why isn’t Castellani sitting in on White House and congressional meetings about the connection between his products and mass shootings instead of Keene and LaPierre of the NRA?

Why isn’t there a White House Task Force on the connection between psychiatric drugs and violence, suicide and murder, both gun related and otherwise?

Why aren’t there congressional hearings on the connection between violence and psychiatric drugs?

Why aren’t there bills being introduced in Congress and state legislatures to tighten down on the indiscriminate, unmonitored use of these killer drugs?

Why is the government still suppressing information about the shooters’ psychiatric drug use at Sandy Hook and Virginia Tech?

Why is the government turning America into a police state in the name of protecting us against nonexistent “reefer madness” while it turns a blind eye to the real, deadly med madness created by psychiatric drugs and the uncontrollable violent rages they produce in some people?

Could it be there is a quiet conspiracy afoot among pharmaceutical companies, the government and the gun grabbers to make Mr. and Mrs. Gun Owner of America the patsies for the violence and to blame lone-wolf violence on guns rather than psychiatric drugs?

Could it be that power-hungry politicians and gun snatchers are out to exploit rare tragedies such as Sandy Hook and use the blood of innocent children to scare America into giving up its constitutional rights to own and bear arms and use them as a deterrent against tyranny?

Could it be that big pharma is today’s big tobacco?

Could it be there is an intentional effort underway in the centers of power in Washington, DC to hide the truth from the American people about the strong connection between psychiatric drugs and violence and to protect the pharmaceutical companies from civil and criminal charges for their responsibility in these heinous crimes?

Could that be the explanation for why there continue to be lawsuits against gun manufacturers — not for defects in their products but rather for the misuse of their products by drug-addled individuals — and why there are few lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies for the obvious flaws in their products, which are producing violence and mayhem?

Could it be the Gun Control movement is simply a blind; just an effort by the triple alliance of left-fascists, big-government politicians and big-pharma prescription-drug dealers to dose and oppress the American people in the name of public safety, “officer safety” and social order?

The gun snatchers such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg all shamefully exploit the bloody murder of children as a pretext to nullify the Second Amendment and short arm the American public with their so-called “assault-weapons” ban and ammunition/clip restrictions. The fact is, the kinds of guns used by mass shooters are far less relevant than the kinds of drugs they were prescribed.

Could that be the explanation for why there continue to be lawsuits against gun manufacturers — not for defects in their products but rather for the misuse of their products by drug-addled individuals — and why there are few lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies for the obvious flaws in their products, which are producing violence and mayhem?

Could it be the Gun Control movement is simply a blind; just an effort by the triple alliance of left-fascists, big-government politicians and big-pharma prescription-drug dealers to dose and oppress the American people in the name of public safety, “officer safety” and social order?

The gun snatchers such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg all shamefully exploit the bloody murder of children as a pretext to nullify the Second Amendment and short arm the American public with their so-called “assault-weapons” ban and ammunition/clip restrictions. The fact is, the kinds of guns used by mass shooters are far less relevant than the kinds of drugs they were prescribed.

(original taken down and scrubbed; bing cache here: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%22Psychiatric+Drugs%2c+Not+A+Lack+Of+Gun+Control%2c+Are+The+Common+Denominator+In+Murderous+Violence%22&d=223019350882&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=_1PMVlsxFtU and http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%22Psychiatric+Drugs%2c+Not+A+Lack+Of+Gun+Control%2c+Are+The+Common+Denominator+In+Murderous+Violence%22&d=154302096617&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=sHgHLMCgq7k)

 

more on the subject can be found on google